Looking at the POH for the DA20, it shows a maximum structural temperature of 131degF in the limitations section and specifies looking at the structural temp indicator between the seats when outside air temperature is greater than 100 degF during preflight.
I see no similar high temperature limitations or inspections for the DA40.
The DA40 has a limitation that it must not be operated when it's temperature is less than -40degF. No such limitation for the DA20.
I assume both types are similarly constructed carbon fiber and glass fiber.
Why don't both types have the same temperature limitations?
Thanks.
DA20 and DA40 Temperature Limits
Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray
- Steve
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:23 am
- First Name: Steve
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N432SC
- Airports: 1T7
- Has thanked: 85 times
- Been thanked: 504 times
Re: DA20 and DA40 Temperature Limits
The low temperature limit on the DA40 is for the avionics, not the structure. With regard to the upper limit, I was told at the factory that the resin and curing process was different for the DA40, thus no upper limit.
Steve
Steve
- 1911Tex
- 3 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2017 1:38 am
- First Name: Larry
- Aircraft Type: DA20-C1
- Aircraft Registration: N389DC
- Airports: KGTU
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: DA20 and DA40 Temperature Limits
I dont think even in the Sahara you would get OAT 131 degF. However a the sealed cabin, no different than a closed car, an OAT of 98 degF could easily pass 131 degF. Note, irregardless if it was a DA20 or DA40, if the temp in the cabin reached that temp without a protective/reflective cover, your avionics would be toast or rapidly going that way. Unprotected high closed cabin temps in summer, are the love of avionics shops! Five years ago in my 182, I was parked in Texas August with OAT 100 degF for only 3 hours (without reflective covers) and my 430 screen slowly went gray on the flight back. My avionics shop saved the day, but it was a very close call.
- Rich
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 4608
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 12:40 pm
- First Name: Rich
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N40XE
- Airports: S39 Prineville OR
- Has thanked: 145 times
- Been thanked: 1187 times
Re: DA20 and DA40 Temperature Limits
My 430 is definitely affected when it gets warm. The screen contrast starts to fade somewhere around 90 degF. The 530 screen seems impervious to any temps I've seen so far. This was true before and after they were conversed to WAAS.
2002 DA40-180: MT, PowerFlow, 530W/430W, KAP140, ext. baggage, 1090 ES out, 2646 MTOW, 40gal., Surefly, Flightstream 210, Orion 600 LED, XeVision, Aspen E5
- Steve
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 1973
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:23 am
- First Name: Steve
- Aircraft Type: DA40
- Aircraft Registration: N432SC
- Airports: 1T7
- Has thanked: 85 times
- Been thanked: 504 times
Re: DA20 and DA40 Temperature Limits
I haven't seen any effects on my avionics of high temps (and I do experience them, being based in S. TX). Having said that, I only have 3 screens (KLN-94 GPS, VM-1000, and fuel gauge). The VM-1000 (an LCD) does get a bit sluggish in very cold weather until it warms up, but otherwise nothing I've experienced.
- CFIDave
- 5 Diamonds Member
- Posts: 2682
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
- First Name: Dave
- Aircraft Type: OTHER
- Aircraft Registration: N333GX
- Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
- Has thanked: 234 times
- Been thanked: 1480 times
Re: DA20 and DA40 Temperature Limits
I suspect that the difference is that the DA20 was certified years before the DA40 (or Cirrus SR20/SR22), and the FAA/EASA had less experience with composite construction back then, thus making them more cautious about issues like overheating.DiamondMike1 wrote:I assume both types are similarly constructed carbon fiber and glass fiber.
Why don't both types have the same temperature limitations?
For a worst case, read about the even earlier history of the Beech Starship and the challenges of getting it certified by the FAA. As one of the first composite-construction aircraft to be certified, the FAA forced Beech to way over-design the composite structure, making the plane too heavy to meet its performance targets -- and ultimately uncompetitive with King Airs that the Starship was intended to replace.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI