Thanks for another opinion. However, the output of both engines is ok at altitude and starts to be different only when alternate air is activated and only at altitudes higher than 14.000 feet.

Yes USD because the majority of forum members are from US.

SR22T G6 is more than 900k so why would we expect DA50 to be cheaper?

BTW DA42 is close to 1M and DA42 is 1.4M.

TBH I also don’t see the niche for 1M SEP non-pressurized, flying below 200 KTAS, regardless of low consumption. For that kind of money you can always go to SET, have pressurization, fly at FL250 and above at 250 KTAS or more, burning 25 or so gallons of JetA. Ok, you won’t own the new aircraft but ...

600k is 300k times 2

300k plane which flies 230 ktas is probably 30 years old and has totally outdated avionics. BTW 100LL is not available in some parts of Europe especially at larger airports.

Colin wrote: ↑Mon Jul 13, 2020 3:43 pm Buying JetA at 3.16 when people were paying 5.50 for 110LL was so strange.

You can imagine Europe where gallon of 100LL used to be $12 (or more) while JetA was $5. The prices these days are much lower ($7.60 vs $3.40) but the ratio is pretty much the same.

CFIDave wrote: ↑Sat Jul 04, 2020 6:11 pm VOR audio communications (is that even still a thing?)

I remember getting ATIS this way at some airport in France (I don’t remember which one).

It's great that everyone is ok, I hope we'll get some info about sudden loss of power that led to crash landing.

https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/237535

Really disappointing numbers - my DA42 with CD-155 engines beats it in every aspect except in useful load. I don't see any market for it with that range (what's real range when flying 181 KTAS at FL160?), probably not so fast if you want range (I guess 150 KTAS), single engine, no chute.