DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Any DA42 related topics.

Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray

Post Reply
User avatar
Yankee17
2 Diamonds Member
2 Diamonds Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:02 pm
First Name: Brian
Aircraft Type: DA42-VI
Aircraft Registration: SE-MIR
Airports: ESOW
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 1 time

DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by Yankee17 »

If anyone is interested in real-life performance of the VI, I posted a couple of longer trips in "reports". This was a round trip with two adult males and full tanks (main & aux) for both legs. Also full de-ice tank with another 10 ltr in reserve.

http://www.diamondaviators.net/reports/flights/5369
http://www.diamondaviators.net/reports/flights/5368
/Brian
42.N119 DA42-VI
40.N061 DA40 NG (sold)
American Champion Citabria
User avatar
Jean
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 741
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:28 am
First Name: Jean
Aircraft Type: DA40
Aircraft Registration: N446DC
Airports: EBLG
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 18 times

Re: DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by Jean »

Awsome !
That must have been a beautiful trip.
Is fuel comsumption indicated for both engines ?
What was the power setting ?
40.446, G1000, KAP 140, Hartzell Metal
User avatar
Yankee17
2 Diamonds Member
2 Diamonds Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:02 pm
First Name: Brian
Aircraft Type: DA42-VI
Aircraft Registration: SE-MIR
Airports: ESOW
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by Yankee17 »

Jean wrote:Is fuel comsumption indicated for both engines ?
What was the power setting ?
On the out leg, FF=7 gph per side. Power setting was 80%. FL140. TAS=180
On the return leg, FF=6.9 gph per side. Power 77%. FL120. TAS=173.

We were battling a stiff headwind on the way back, so I stayed lower. If I want more endurance, I pull power back to 70-75%a and can count on 6-6.5 gph per side. At FL160-180 a TAS of 180 at that power setting is not unheard of.
/Brian
42.N119 DA42-VI
40.N061 DA40 NG (sold)
American Champion Citabria
User avatar
Rick
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 1575
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 10:09 pm
First Name: Rick
Aircraft Type: DA40
Aircraft Registration: NONE
Airports: KROA
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 297 times

Re: DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by Rick »

Jean wrote:Is fuel comsumption indicated for both engines ?
Our REPORTS section doesn't handle the DA42 engine data correctly yet. I'm trying to find some spare time to work on it, but no luck yet. I believe the fuel consumption (and most other engine data) is only for the first engine at this point.
Roanoke, VA (KROA)
User avatar
Yankee17
2 Diamonds Member
2 Diamonds Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:02 pm
First Name: Brian
Aircraft Type: DA42-VI
Aircraft Registration: SE-MIR
Airports: ESOW
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by Yankee17 »

Rick wrote:I believe the fuel consumption (and most other engine data) is only for the first engine at this point.
That seems to be right, comparing to the CSV file. Usually, we'll try to run the engines symmetrically, so the data you see now should be a pretty good indication. (And, if I can keep the wings level, the altitude readings should be quite similar for the two engines, as well!) :D
/Brian
42.N119 DA42-VI
40.N061 DA40 NG (sold)
American Champion Citabria
User avatar
CFIDave
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 2678
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 3:40 pm
First Name: Dave
Aircraft Type: OTHER
Aircraft Registration: N333GX
Airports: KJYO Leesburg VA
Has thanked: 231 times
Been thanked: 1473 times

Re: DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by CFIDave »

I've found the way to extract great performance in the DA42-VI is to fly high (the plane, not the pilot unless over Colorado :D ). The rule of thumb seems to be an increase of 3 knots TAS for each 2000 feet added to the altitude.

Except when facing bad headwinds at higher altitudes, our "sweet spot" is the recommended 75% cruise power, burning 6.6 gal/hour per engine (13 gph total), and flying on O2 at around 15,000 feet. The result is usually around 180 knots TAS. This is with 2 adults, full fuel and de-ice, and luggage. Our plane seems to be at least 4 knots faster than what's published in the AFM/POH at any altitude and power setting.
Epic Aircraft E1000 GX
Former DA40XLS, DA42-VI, and DA62 owner
ATP, CFI, CFI-I, MEI
User avatar
Yankee17
2 Diamonds Member
2 Diamonds Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:02 pm
First Name: Brian
Aircraft Type: DA42-VI
Aircraft Registration: SE-MIR
Airports: ESOW
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by Yankee17 »

CFIDave wrote:Our plane seems to be at least 4 knots faster than what's published in the AFM/POH at any altitude and power setting.
I concur.
/Brian
42.N119 DA42-VI
40.N061 DA40 NG (sold)
American Champion Citabria
User avatar
carym
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 1021
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:00 pm
First Name: cary
Aircraft Type: DA42
Aircraft Registration: N336TS
Airports: KTYQ
Has thanked: 37 times
Been thanked: 83 times

Re: DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by carym »

CFIDave wrote:I've found the way to extract great performance in the DA42-VI is to fly high (the plane, not the pilot unless over Colorado :D ). The rule of thumb seems to be an increase of 3 knots TAS for each 2000 feet added to the altitude.

Except when facing bad headwinds at higher altitudes, our "sweet spot" is the recommended 75% cruise power, burning 6.6 gal/hour per engine (13 gph total), and flying on O2 at around 15,000 feet. The result is usually around 180 knots TAS. This is with 2 adults, full fuel and de-ice, and luggage. Our plane seems to be at least 4 knots faster than what's published in the AFM/POH at any altitude and power setting.
Just for comparison, and for whatever it is worth, I fly my 1.7's at 75% power at 5.5 gal/hr/side and get 160 knots TAS at 15000 feet (with full tanks, 2 adults and luggage, full de-ice, and on oxygen). At 18% more full usage you get 12% more speed. Pretty good increase in speed with not that much more fuel burn. It must be related to those small but numerous airframe cleanups they did for the -VI. I find that usually I really don't save much time in going up that high unless I am on a very long (3+ hours) x-country.
Cary
DA42.AC036 (returned)
S35 (1964 V-tail Bonanza)
Alaska adventure: http://mariashflying.tumblr.com
User avatar
Henrik
4 Diamonds Member
4 Diamonds Member
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:08 pm
First Name: Henrik
Aircraft Type: OTHER
Aircraft Registration: NONE
Airports:
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 11 times

Re: DA42-VI Real-life Performance

Post by Henrik »

I tend to do longer trips (4+ hrs) in my DA42-VI & typically file FL170/180.

The engines perform even better at altitude here in the tropics with the high density altitude. (ISA+15/20)

I generally cruise somewhere around ktas 185-190 @ 77% power. Speed is just really addictive & since Jet A is so relatively cheap here, a slightly higher fuel flow is no big deal.

Having said that, at lower altitudes like FL130, if you're looking for "max" high speed cruise & don't care about fuel flow/range, 85% generally makes the best sense - the speed difference between 92% and 85% is just 4-5 kts, not really worth it to thrash the engines.

At FL180 you won't get more than 82-83% max power on the Austros, but it'll give you somewhere around 193-195 ktas. Best speed I've ever had at max power 82%, ISA+15 & FL 180 was 198 ktas.
Attachments
20131110_1638.jpg
Post Reply