Diamond Aircraft - Yes to Farnborough and No to Oshkosh

The ramblings of our community of aviators.

Moderators: Rick, Lance Murray

User avatar
Keith M
4 Diamonds Member
4 Diamonds Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:54 am
First Name: Keith
Aircraft Type: DA40D
Airports: EGNH
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Re: Diamond Aircraft - Yes to Farnborough and No to Oshkosh

Post by Keith M »

krellis wrote:More money spent on pipe dream projects
Not so sure it's a pipe dream from Diamond's perspective. President Eisenhower's 1961 warning about the Military-Industrial Complex has long since come to pass, so it doesn't matter what state the economy is in, military requirements take precedence over all other demands on state spending. Diamond just seem to be positioning themselves to get their share of that cake!
Antoine
5 Diamonds Member
5 Diamonds Member
Posts: 2043
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:00 pm
First Name: Antoine
Aircraft Type: OTHER
Aircraft Registration: N121AG
Airports: LSGG
Has thanked: 87 times
Been thanked: 220 times

Re: Diamond Aircraft - Yes to Farnborough and No to Oshkosh

Post by Antoine »

Let's face it. We are a dying species.
Almost no-one on this planet can afford the combined financial, administrative and learning burden of being a "certified" pilot. Why do you think sales of ultralight aircraft are booming?

Sad as it may be, I think Diamond are making the right moves from their perspective. This however does not mean that I have understanding for their customer-care policy.

Owners of AVGAS burning Diamonds are left on their own. And if you own a diesel burner at least "they" remember they sold it to you some day....

A great opportunity in fact.........
Post Reply